How the media really works

The "Jewish Conspiracy" controlling the media, etc. There have been some systematic analyses done of the news media that would prove that there is a massive bias in the media and who owns it. Of course the argument that the market forces cause the news media to compete with each other for audience viewer ship so that they can charge large amounts of money to their advertisers is something that ties in as well. In order to get the most amount of audience view ship the media competes with each other to get at the story first and process the information so that the public will turn to them first for information instead of using there competitors within the news media. In order to be competitive at processing the story first, the news media relies on the government to provide them with information and "expert analysis".

The Government has a large intelligence apparatus spread all over the world that allows them to gain information about changing events. Market forces do not make it economically realistic for the news media to try to duplicate the same intelligence apparatus as the government.

The political elites know that the news media is dependant on them for information and they cultivate the attention of the news media by readily providing them with news briefs and press conferences. The political elites synthesis information for the media in such a way that serves their interests and interpret the conflicts from their perspectives.

They call enemies of the U.S. "terrorists" and allies of the U.S. "freedom fighters". There is no objective answer about who is a terrorist and who is a freedom fighter.

From the perspective of the British Sam Adams could be a terrorist. The British newspapers probably described him that way. The fact that their is constant repetition of a particular view point with only a token mention of the alternative view points makes people believe that they are getting a fair view of reality.

When in fact they are getting an interpretation of a particular conflict that is being told from the point of view our political elites, Political elites also make conscious decisions to give the media information about certain conflicts and will ignore other conflicts around the world based on whether the combatants are friends or enemies of the United States.

As an example when the Lecha Welsa's Solidarity movement was trying to gain freedom in Poland the U.S media covered the various conflicts between the police and the workers on a daily basis because the Communist Polish government was an enemy of the U.S. and U.S. officials made an intentional attempt to highlight the violence that went on in that country to make the Polish government look bad.

If a Catholic priest was kidnapped or the Polish government used tear gas on demonstrators the news media covered that story for a week. But in South America, the news media did not cover the violence being perpetrated by governments that were Allies of the U.S nearly as much. General Pinochet of Chile is supposed to have killed and arrested thousands of people.

Since U.S. officials did not make the information readily available to the media because they did not want to make one of their allies look bad, you never heard stories in the news media of individuals being arrested and tortured on a regular basis in Chile. If there are a few stories that mention some acts of violence it makes the system of propaganda that much stronger because people think that they are getting a fair presentation of reality. They think that there is overwhelming evidence supporting a particular position and some flimsy evidence supporting the opposite point of view and that America's foreign policy interests are fair or moral. When in fact the effect of this symbolic relationship between political elites and the media is that the media dispenses information in a way that reflects an elite world view.

As far as us discussing who are the elites in America. It can certainly be stated that conscious whites are not one of them. We are marginalized in this country. However certain groups in this country are well organized and work together collectively to fulfill their society's best interests and elected officials actually listen to them. AIPAC (American Israeli Political Action committee) is the largest political action committee in the United States. They give money to virtually every member of Congress and every mainstream presidential candidate (with the exception of Pat Buchanan).

AIPAC does not care about American foreign policy interests; AIPAC only cares about Israel's foreign policy interests. If Israel nuked the Middle East, AIPAC would lobby America to support for Israel. There is no comparable Arab lobby in the United States to lobby American elected officials to support the Palestinians.

There is no "comparable" pro white/euro American lobby in the United States to lobby American elected officials to have an American First Foreign policy. As a result of AIPAC lobbying efforts, no matter which party is in power, America will loyal to Israel's interests. It does not matter that some of America's elected officials are not Jewish. They all receive campaign contributions from the Jewish lobby and therefore do whatever the Jews want.

This complete support amongst our elected officials for Israel results in a bias in the news media. The news media is much more likely to cover stories where Jews are killed than stories where 20 Palestinians children are shot by Israeli soldiers for throwing rocks because the political elites in America make a concerted effort to provide information to the news media that makes America's Allies look good and America's enemies look evil.

When a Jewish person is killed the story is told from a "humanistic perspective". They show a picture of the person's crying family and the funeral precession. The purpose is to make you feel sorry of the person.

Then they show a picture of a bunch of Arabs screaming and yelling, firing guns into the air and burning American flags. This does not even have anything to do with the original person being killed but constant repetition of these pictures convey the impression on Americans that the Jews are innocent victims and the Arabs are crazy people who love violence and hate America for no reason.

Most people are not aware that the Israeli's have built their own housing settlements on Palestinians land. Most people were not aware of the war crimes that Ariel Sharon has committed in 1982 when he allowed a few thousand Lebanese people held to in a POW camp toe be killed until Belgium indicted him a few days ago. Most people have heard of Hamas and their desire to destroy Israel but have not heard about Israeli leader Rabbi Meir Khane who before he was killed in 1990 wanted to take all the Palestinian land on the West Bank and Gaza strip away from the Palestinians to make more living space for Jews and push the Palestinians into Jordan. The news media does not cover these things the same way because American elected officials selectively provide information to the news media that makes their allies look good and their enemies look evil.

There are many Middle East "think tanks" in Washington D.C. Most of these are very biased towards Israel because either Jews work there or because Jews are the ones who give money to support the "research" of the "think tank". When they are asked to come on shows like Meet the Press, Hannity and Combs, THe O'Riely Factor and give their interpretation of the Middle East conflict they are all biased in favor of Israel.

The analysis they give usually presents Israel as being all peaceful and the Arabs as being crazy killers with no legitimate interest. Since all the elected officials in the United States are bought and paid for by the Israeli lobby. None of them have anything bad to say about Israel. They never call assassination attempts against Palestinians leader’s acts of terror or bombing Yassir Arafat's compound to be an act of terror. No mention of the daily shootings that go on against Palestinians. No mention of how the Jews have destroyed Palestinians houses and built their own housing settlements on top in the West bank and Gaza Strip.

No journalist asks any tough questions about what is the difference between the Jews wanting to have a pure Jewish State and the South African System of Apartheid where whites wanted to have their own separate society because they identified themselves as being different from the blacks. This media bias has to do with the Power that the Israeli lobby has in America. They are able to buy the support of American politicians and then since the news media is dependant on political elites for sources and information, the news media presents information in a biased manner.

This is not a "conspiracy theory". This is a systematic analysis of the nature of the mass media in our free market economic system to show how it is used as a system of propaganda to further Jewish Interests at the expense of America's foreign Policy interests.

Theunjustmedia.com